Trucking accident attorney for Sacramento legal counsel

Trucking accident attorney for Sacramento legal counsel

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:09
  • Updated: 03 Mar 2009
  • views: 8
videos
Have you suffered injuries in a car, motorcycle or truck accident? Find a personal injury and trucking accident attorney in Sacramento. Simply visit our legal directory to find profiles of highly qualified law firms. Even get trucking accident safety and attorney info. A crash can leave you suffering injuries- find counsel you can trust. Get a free case evaluation at our site.
https://wn.com/Trucking_Accident_Attorney_For_Sacramento_Legal_Counsel
WOMEN'S March & Rally - CA. State Capitol, Sacramento

WOMEN'S March & Rally - CA. State Capitol, Sacramento

  • Order:
  • Duration: 33:09
  • Updated: 22 Jan 2017
  • views: 8128
videos
"Keep not thou silence, O God...For, lo, thine ENEMIES make a TUMULT: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with ONE CONSENT: they are CONFEDERATE against thee"- Psalm 83
https://wn.com/Women'S_March_Rally_Ca._State_Capitol,_Sacramento
CWL In-House Counsel Network

CWL In-House Counsel Network

  • Order:
  • Duration: 4:42
  • Updated: 26 May 2015
  • views: 87
videos
As a CWL member, In-House attorneys have the opportunity to join the exclusive CWL In-House Counsel Network.
https://wn.com/Cwl_In_House_Counsel_Network
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento August 9, 2016

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento August 9, 2016

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:44:13
  • Updated: 17 Aug 2016
  • views: 566
videos
Online agenda available at http://hsr.ca.gov/Board/monthly_brdmtg.html 1. Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the May 10 and June 14, 2016 Meetings 2. Consider a Peninsula Corridor Improvement Plan consisting of: Funding for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board’s (PCJPB) Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) via: Adopting Responsible Agency California Environmental Quality Act Findings, and Approving a Funding Agreement with the PCJPB and a Seven Party Supplement to the 2012 Caltrain Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Funding the PCEP Entering into an MOU with the City of San Mateo for Grade Separations and Passing Tracks 3. Consider Approving the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Audit Plan and Acknowledging the Internal Quality Assurance Self-Assessment for Fiscal Year 2015-16 4. Consider Awarding the Contract for Geotechnical Site Investigation Services in the Silicon Valley to Central Valley Line 5. Construction Progress Report 6. Quarterly Presentation of Finance & Audit Committee Reports 7. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation: Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780) County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861) County of Kern v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001863) First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864) Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865) City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND v. California Air Resources Board and CHSRA as a real party in interest; (Fresno Superior Court Case No. 14CECG01788) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1). * “A” denotes an “Action” item; “I” denotes an “Information” item; “C” denotes “consent” item.
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Sacramento_August_9,_2016
California Legislature Hires Former Attorney General Eric Holder For Legal Counsel

California Legislature Hires Former Attorney General Eric Holder For Legal Counsel

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:40
  • Updated: 05 Jan 2017
  • views: 216
videos
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon says the move to bring in Holder for $25,000 a month isn't an overreaction, but a response to what Donald Trump said during the election season and the president-elect's cabinet choices.
https://wn.com/California_Legislature_Hires_Former_Attorney_General_Eric_Holder_For_Legal_Counsel
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento February 14, 2017

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento February 14, 2017

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:35:10
  • Updated: 21 Feb 2017
  • views: 499
videos
Online agenda available at http://hsr.ca.gov/Board/monthly_brdmtg.html 1. Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the January 18, 2017 Board Meeting 2. Consider Providing Funding to the Construction Package 1 DesignBuild Services Contract to Reconcile Provisional Sums for PG&E and AT&T Utility Relocation with the 2016 Business Plan 3. Consider Amending the Agreement with Caltrans for the State Route 99 Realignment Project to Reconcile with the 2016 Business Plan 4. Consider Awarding Contracts for Right-of-Way Services 5. Consider Approving a Contract with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Field LLP 6. Program Status Update 7. Construction Progress Report 8. Small Business Program Update 9. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation: - John Tos; Town of Atherton; County of Kings; Morris Brown; Patricia Louise Hogan-Giorni; Anthony Wynne, Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail, TRANSDEF; California Rail Foundation v. California High-Speed Rail Authority (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2016- 00204740) - Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780) - County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861) - First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864) - Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865) - City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1).
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Sacramento_February_14,_2017
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento January, 18 2017

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento January, 18 2017

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:27:54
  • Updated: 20 Jan 2017
  • views: 560
videos
Online agenda available at http://hsr.ca.gov/Board/monthly_brdmtg.html 1. Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the December 13, 2016 Board Meeting 2. Consider Amending the Board’s Policies and Procedures to Account for the Enactment of Assembly Bill 1813 3. Consider Concurring with the Initial Staff Recommended Preliminary Preferred Alternative Alignment for the Central Valley Wye for Inclusion in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced to Fresno Project Section 4. Consider Providing Funding to the Construction Package 1 DesignBuild Services Contract to Reconcile Provisional Sums for PG&E and AT&T Utility Relocation with the 2016 Board-Approved Business Plan and Approving a Related AT&T Contract Amendment 5. Consider Amending the Agreement with Caltrans for the State Route 99 Realignment Project to Reconcile with the 2016 Business Plan 6. Consider Providing Approval to Release Five Requests for Qualifications for Right-of-Way Engineering and Surveying Services for the Silicon Valley to Central Valley Segment 7. Quarterly Presentation of Finance & Audit Committee Reports 8. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation:  John Tos; Town of Atherton; County of Kings; Morris Brown; Patricia Louise Hogan-Giorni; Anthony Wynne, Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail, TRANSDEF; California Rail Foundation v. California High-Speed Rail Authority (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2016- 00204740)  Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780)  County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861)  County of Kern v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001863)  First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864)  Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865)  City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1). * “A” denotes an “Action” item; “I” denotes an “Information” item; “C” denotes “consent”
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Sacramento_January,_18_2017
5 Ways to Show Your Customers Appreciation, by Rocklin, Roseville and Sacramento Area Attorney

5 Ways to Show Your Customers Appreciation, by Rocklin, Roseville and Sacramento Area Attorney

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:39
  • Updated: 11 Feb 2013
  • views: 142
videos
You appreciate your customers. You know that you do, but do they realize it? If you don't know the answer to that question it may be time to hold a 'customer appreciation' day or week. Doing so is just one simple way to give back to those who give to you all year, and lets them know you appreciate their business. Whether your business is in the Rocklin and Sacramento areas or beyond, showing customer appreciation is always a smart. The Law Offices of Terry L. Gilbeau provides personalized counsel to clients in a variety of business and personal matters, including creditors' rights, debt collection, products liability and international transaction issues. His office is located in Rocklin, CA, just outside of Sacramento, CA, near Roseville and can be reached at (916-626-5539) or email Terry at tgilbeau@gilbeaulaw.com. Click here for the firm website http://www.gilbeaulaw.com/
https://wn.com/5_Ways_To_Show_Your_Customers_Appreciation,_By_Rocklin,_Roseville_And_Sacramento_Area_Attorney
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento March 15, 2017

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento March 15, 2017

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:45:09
  • Updated: 24 Mar 2017
  • views: 549
videos
Online agenda available at http://hsr.ca.gov/Board/monthly_brdmtg.html 1. Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the February 14, 2017 Board Meeting 2. Consider Amending the Contract with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to Share Project Development Costs for the Integration of High-Speed Rail at Los Angeles Union Station 3. Update on the Early Train Operator Procurement 4. Update on the Central Valley and San Francisco to San Jose Peninsula Corridor Segment Funding Plans 5. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation: - John Tos; Town of Atherton; County of Kings; Morris Brown; Patricia Louise Hogan-Giorni; Anthony Wynne, Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail, TRANSDEF; California Rail Foundation v. California High-Speed Rail Authority (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2016- 00204740) - Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780) - County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861) - First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864) - Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865) - City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1).
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Sacramento_March_15,_2017
Family Court Corruption Protest - California Supreme Court - Judicial Council of California

Family Court Corruption Protest - California Supreme Court - Judicial Council of California

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:23
  • Updated: 06 Apr 2014
  • views: 2820
videos
Sacramento Family Court reform advocate Robert Saunders leads a protest at the William Ridgeway Family Relations courthouse in Sacramento, California. From the documentary Divorce Corp, featuring four family court cases from Sacramento Superior Court and designating the court as the most corrupt in the United States. As a result of an unlawful "no contact" child custody order issued against Robert Saunders by Judge Matthew Gary in 2009, Saunders has been prohibited from contacting his twin daughters, Julia and Laura. Judge Matthew Gary was subsequently ordered off the Saunders case by an outside judge for bias and misuse of contempt law against Saunders, yet he still has not been allowed to see his children. Saunders filed a complaint against the judge with the Commission on Judicial Performance, the state agency responsible for oversight and accountability of California judges. The CJP, run by Director and Chief Counsel Victoria Henley, dismissed Sanders' complaint and took no action against Gary. For Sacramento Family Court News coverage of Judge Matthew Gary's misconduct against Saunders: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/2012/04/Hon-Matthew-J-Gary-disqualification-judicial-misconduct-contempt-Hon-Xapuri-B-Villapudua-judges-pro-per-Robert-Saunders-pro-se-Sacramento-Family-Court-Sacramento-County-Superior-Court-Family-Court-Accountability-Coalition.html In November, 2013, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Thadd Blizzard authorized an illegal, out-of-state child abduction by April Berger, the mother of Saunders' children. While under a temporary custody order, Berger relocated the children to Hawaii without a final custody determination and without prior court permission as required by law. At the request of divorce attorney Richard Sokol, who also serves as a temporary judge in the same court, Blizzard after-the-fact approved the unlawful out-of-state transfer. Child abduction is prohibited by California Penal Code section 278.5, and under § 278.5(c) a custody order obtained after-the-fact does not constitute a defense to the crime. For Sacramento Family Court News coverage of the Blizzard ruling - including a leaked court reporter transcript from the hearing - visit this link: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/2014/01/Judge-Thadd-Blizzard-Authorizes-Illegal-Child-Abduction-and-Out-of-State-Move-Away-for-Sacramento-Superior-Court-Judge-Pro-Tem-Attorney-Richard-Sokol-Sacramento-County-Bar-Association-Family-Law-Section-Member-Judge-Misconduct-Code-of-Judicial-Ethics.html The 2014-2015 Sacramento County Superior Court Presiding Judge is the Hon. Robert C. Hight. Current and former Sacramento Family Court Judges include: Judge James M.Mize, Judge Bunmi O. Awoniyi, Judge Tami R. Bogert, Judge Steven M. Gevercer, Judge Thadd A. Blizzard, Judge Matthew J. Gary, Judge Sharon A. Lueras, Judge Eugene L. Balonon, and Judge Tani Cantil-Sakauye. California Judicial Branch oversight and accountability is the responsibility of Commission on Judicial Performance Director Victoria B. Henley, California State Auditor Elaine M. Howle, Judicial Council Director Steven E. Jahr, Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, State Bar of California Chief Trial Counsel Jayne Kim, 3rd District Court of Appeal Justice Vance Raye, and U.S. Attorneys Benjamin B. Wagner and Melinda L. Haag. The officers of the Sacramento County Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee are Elaine V. Van Beveren, Fredrick S. Cohen, Paula D. Salinger, and Gregory W. Dwyer. Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers allege that Sacramento Federal Court judges individually and collectively are responsible for helping conceal systemic civil rights violations, honest services fraud, and RICO racketeering by Sacramento County state court family law judges and judge pro tem attorneys against indigent, financially disadvantaged and disabled pro per litigants. The 2014 documentary film Divorce Corp exposed corruption in family courts throughout the United States, and designated Sacramento County as one of the most corrupt in the country. Sacramento court reform advocates charge and have documented that, for over 10 years, the EDCA has obstructed, impeded, and dismissed federal civil rights litigation against the RICO enterprise conspirators. US District Court Eastern District of California judges: Judge William B. Shubb, Judge Edmund F. Brennan, Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr, Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, Judge Morrison C. England Jr, Judge Gregory G. Hollows, Judge John A. Mendez, Judge Kendall J. Newman, Judge Troy L. Nunley, Judge Allison Claire, Judge Dale A. Drozd, Judge Lawrence K. Karlton, and Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.
https://wn.com/Family_Court_Corruption_Protest_California_Supreme_Court_Judicial_Council_Of_California
Immigration Lawyers in Sacramento, Santa Clara & San Francisco California

Immigration Lawyers in Sacramento, Santa Clara & San Francisco California

  • Order:
  • Duration: 0:54
  • Updated: 19 Nov 2013
  • views: 9696
videos
With Offices in San Francisco, Sacramento and Santa Clara California we provide legal services with a focus on the many areas of immigration law: Business and Employment Immigration, Family Immigration (greencards and hardship waivers), and other visas (J-1 Exchange Visitor Visas)
https://wn.com/Immigration_Lawyers_In_Sacramento,_Santa_Clara_San_Francisco_California
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento May 10, 2017

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Sacramento May 10, 2017

  • Order:
  • Duration: 40:08
  • Updated: 15 May 2017
  • views: 501
videos
1. Consider Amending the Board’s Policies and Procedures to Include Ex Officio Members Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1813 2. Consider Approving the Board Meeting Minutes from the March 15, 2017 Board Meeting 3. Closed Session Pertaining to Employment of an Executive Director (CEO) The Authority Board will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(a) to discuss the employment of a new Executive Director (CEO) 4. Executive Director (CEO) Appointment and Compensation Deliberation by the Board Consideration of a Resolution for the appointment of a High-Speed Rail Authority Executive Director (CEO) pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 185024 5. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation: - John Tos; Town of Atherton; County of Kings; Morris Brown; Patricia Louise Hogan-Giorni; Anthony Wynne, Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail, TRANSDEF; - Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780) - County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861) - First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864) - Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865) - City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1).
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Sacramento_May_10,_2017
CAHSRA Board Meeting, Closed Session Sacramento October 10, 2016

CAHSRA Board Meeting, Closed Session Sacramento October 10, 2016

  • Order:
  • Duration: 0:56
  • Updated: 11 Oct 2016
  • views: 271
videos
CAHSRA Board Chair Dan Richard gavels in a closed session of the board on October 10, 2010. Agenda 1. Closed Session Pertaining to Litigation The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(A) to confer with counsel with regard to the following litigation: - Kings County; Kings County Farm Bureau; California Citizens for High-Speed Rail Accountability; Community Coalition on High-Speed Rail; California Rail Foundation; TRANSDEF v. Surface Transportation Board; CHSRA Intervenor (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-71780) - County of Kings v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001861) - County of Kern v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001863) - First Free Baptist Church of Bakersfield v. California HighSpeed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001864) - Dignity Health v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001865) - City of Shafter v. California High-Speed Rail Authority; (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2014-80001908) - TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND v. California Air Resources Board and CHSRA as a real party in interest; (Fresno Superior Court Case No. 14CECG01788) The Authority will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code section 11126(e)(1)&(2)(B)(i);11126(a)(1).
https://wn.com/Cahsra_Board_Meeting,_Closed_Session_Sacramento_October_10,_2016
5 common grounds to "appeal" a criminal case

5 common grounds to "appeal" a criminal case

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:58
  • Updated: 27 Aug 2015
  • views: 2761
videos
A former DA explains the 5 most common grands to appeal a criminal conviction. These include erroneous admission of evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, jury misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel and insufficient evidence. A criminal defense attorney explains how any of these ground for appeal could be used potentially to overturn a criminal conviction. More info at http://www.shouselaw.com/grounds-for-appeal.html or call (888) 327-4652 for a free consultation. If you or a loved one is charged with a crime we invite you to contact us at Shouse Law Group. We can provide a free consultation in office or by phone. We have local offices in Los Angeles, the San Fernando Valley, Pasadena, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura, San Bernardino, Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, San Diego, Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose and throughout California.
https://wn.com/5_Common_Grounds_To_Appeal_A_Criminal_Case
Rep. Bera discusses appointment of special counsel to Russia investigation

Rep. Bera discusses appointment of special counsel to Russia investigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 0:37
  • Updated: 19 May 2017
  • views: 19
videos
May 18, 2018
https://wn.com/Rep._Bera_Discusses_Appointment_Of_Special_Counsel_To_Russia_Investigation
Counsel of Hushai -  2 Samuel 17

Counsel of Hushai - 2 Samuel 17

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:41
  • Updated: 24 Jan 2015
  • views: 371
videos
It is Hushai whom King David tasked to thwart for him the counsel of Ahithophel. This task is accomplished here when Absalom and all the Israelites decided that the counsel of Hushai the Archite is better than the counsel of Ahithophel. For the LORD had commanded that Ahithophel’s good counsel should be thwarted, so that he might bring Absalom to ruin. Hushai then gave King David all the information he needs and warned him not spend the night at the fords near the wilderness, but cross over the Jordan River without fail and passed these messages through the priests Zadok and Abiathar; and then this information is passed through Jonathan and Ahimaaz who will finally deliver it to King David. See https://sites.google.com/site/biblereader77/2-samuel/2-samuel-chapter-17
https://wn.com/Counsel_Of_Hushai_2_Samuel_17